|
Important
Scientific Publications by Other Researchers
Anthony, T., Copper, C., & Mullen, B. (1992).Cross–racial identification: A
social
cognitive integration. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin,
18,
296-301.
Carey, S. (1981). The development of face perception: In G. Davies, H.
Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 9-38).
New York: Academic Press.
Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). The development of face
recognition--A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16,
257-269.
Carroo, A. W. (1987). Recognition of faces as a function of race, attitudes,
and reported cross-racial friendships. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64,
319-325.
Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1981). Depth of processing in response to
own and other race faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7,
475-480.
Chance, J., & Goldstein, A. (1996). The Other-Race Effect and Eyewitness
Identification. In S. L. Sporer, R. Malpass, & G Koehnken (Eds.),
Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 153-176). New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chance, J. E., Turner, A. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1982). Development of face
recognition for own- and other-race faces. Journal of Psychology, 112,
29-37.
Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact
hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879-894.
Chung, M. S., & Thompson, D. (1995). Development of face recognition.
British Journal of Psychology, 86, 55-87.
Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., & McEwan, T. (1996).
Convicted by
juries,
exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish
innocence after trial. Alexandria, VA: National Institute of Justice.
Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as
factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The
eyewitness,
psychology, and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An
effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115,
107-117.
Doris, J. L. (Ed.). (1991). The suggestibility of children’s recollections.
Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
Elliott, E. S., Wills, E. J., & Goldstein, A. G. (1973). The effects of
discrimination
training on the recognition of white and oriental faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 71-71.
Ellis, H. D., Deregowski, J. B., & Shepherd, J. W. (1975). Descriptions of
white and black faces by white and black subjects. International Journal of
Psychology, 10, 119-123.
Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). "What is
"special" about face perception?" Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
Feingold, G. A. (1914). The influence of environment on the identification
of persons and things. Journal of Criminal Law and Political Science, 5,
39-51.
Feinman, S., & Entwisle, D. R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other
children's faces. Child Development, 47, 506-510.
Flin, R. H. (1985). Development of face recognition: An encoding switch?
British Journal of Psychology, 76, 123-134.
Galper, R. E. (1973). Functional race membership and recognition of faces.
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 455-462.
Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D., & Holland, H. (1986).
Enhancement of
eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. American Journal of
Psychology, 99, 385-401.
Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1985). Effects of training on Japanese
face
recognition: Reduction of the other-race effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic
Society, 23, 211-214.
Huff, R., Rattner, A., & Saragin, E. (1996).
Convicted but innocent:
Wrongful conviction
and public policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kassin, S. M. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: The fifth rule.
Law and
Human Behavior, 22, 649-653.
Kassin, S. M., Ellsworth. P. C., & Smith, V. L. (1989). The "General
Acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of
the experts. American Psychologist, 44, 1089-1098.
Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the
"General Acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the
experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405-416.
Lavrakas, P. J., Buri, J. R., & Mayzner, M. S. (1976). A perspective of the
recognition of other race faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 475-481.
Leippe, M. R. (1995). The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 909-959.
Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face
categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 22, 1364-1382.
Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and
perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross
race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129,
559-574.
Lindsay, D. S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony.
In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness
testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.27-55). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Lindsay, R.C.L., Ross, D.F., Smith, S.M. & Flanigan, S. (1999). Does race
influence
measures of lineup fairness? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S109-S119.
Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness
identification from
lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Luce, T. S. (1974). The role of experience in inter-racial recognition.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 39-41.
MacLin, O. H., MacLin, M. K., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Race, arousal,
attention, exposure and delay: An examination of factors moderating face
recognition. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 134-152.
MacLin, O. H., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The
ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 98-118.
Malpass, R. S. (1981). Training in face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis,
&
J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 271-285). London:
Academic Press.
Malpass, R. S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other
race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 330-334.
Malpass, R. S., & Lavigueur, H., & Weldon, D. E. (1973). Verbal and visual
training
in face recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 330-334.
Memon, A., Bartlett, J.C., Rose, R. & Gray, C. (2003) The aging eyewitness:
The effects of face-age and delay upon younger and older observers. British
Journal of Gerontology, 58, 338-345
Munsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and
crime.
New York: Clark Boardman.
Ng, W., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure
of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25,
217-232.
Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (2003). Children's face
recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 88,
760-763.
Platz, S. J., & Hosch, H. M. (1988). Cross-racial ethnic eyewitness
identification: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18,
972-984.
Rattner, A., Weimann, G. & Fishman, G., (1990). Cross ethnic identification
and misidentification. Sociology and Social Research, 74, 73-79.
Ross, D.F., Read, J.D., & Tolgia, M.P. (Eds.) (1994).
Adult eyewitness
testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Sangrigoli, S., & de Schonen, S. (2004a). Recognition of own-race and
other-race faces by three-month-old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 45, 1219-1227.
Sangrigoli, S., & de Schonen, S. (2004b). Effect of visual experience on
face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects.
Developmental Science, 7, 74–87.
Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2001).
Actual innocence: When justice
goes
wrong and how to make it right. New York: Signet.
Shepherd, J. (1981). Social factors in face recognition. In G. Davies, H.
Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp.55-79).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Shepherd, J. W., & Deregowski, J. B. (1981). Races and faces – a comparison
of the responses of Africans and Europeans to faces of the same and
different races. British Journal of Psychology, 20, 125-133.
Shepherd, J. W., Gibling, F., & Ellis, H. D. (1991). The effects of
distinctiveness, presentation time and delay on face recognition. European
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 137-145.
Smith, S. M., Stinson, V., & Prosser, M. A. (2004). Do they all look alike?
An exploration of decision-making strategies in the cross-race facial
identifications. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 146-154.
Sporer, S. L. (1991). Deep - Deeper - Deepest? Encoding strategies and the
recognition of human faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 17, 323-333.
Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An
integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36-97.
Sporer, S. L., Malpass, R. S., & Koehnken, G. (1996).
Psychological issues
in
eyewitness identification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S. Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing,
confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy
relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118,
315-327.
Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect.
Law and
Human Behavior, 16, 413-424.
Stern, L. W. (1910). Abstracts of lectures on the psychology of testimony.
American
Journal of Psychology, 21, 273-282.
Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence (1999).
Eyewitness evidence:
A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: United States Department of
Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
Teitelbaum, S., & Geiselman, R. E. (1997). Observer mood and cross-racial
recognition of faces. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 93-106.
Thomson, D. M. (1986). Face recognition: More than a feeling of familiarity?
In H. D. Ellis, M.A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face
processing (pp. 391-399). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Thomson, D. M. (1989). Issues posed by developmental research. In A. W.
Young & H.D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp.
391-399). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tollestrup, P. A., Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Actual victims and
witnesses
to robbery and fraud: An archival analysis. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, &
M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness,
inversion and race on face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
Valentine, T., Chiroro, P., & Dixon, R. (1995). An account of the other-race
effect and the contact hypothesis based on a ‘face space’ model of face
recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of
face recognition: Exploration of face space (pp. 69-94). London: Routledge.
Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards and exemplar model of face
processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 44, 671-703.
Wall, P. (1965). Eyewitness identification in criminal cases. Springfield,
IL:
Charles C. Thomas.
Weimann, G., Fishman, G., & Rattner, A. (1988). Social distance and
misidentification. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 27,
217-225.
Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables
and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
36, 1546-1557.
Wells, G. L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications.
Journal of
Applied
Social Psychology, 14, 89-103.
Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification?
American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1980). On estimating the diagnosticity of
eyewitness
non- identifications. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 776-784.
Wells, G.L., & Loftus, E.F. (Eds.) (1984).
Eyewitness testimony:
Psychological
perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. L., & Luus, E. (1990). Police lineups as experiments: Social
methodology
as a framework for properly-conducted lineups. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 16, 106-117.
Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J.
W., &
Fulero, S. (2000). Eyewitness research: The long road to national
guidelines. American Psychologist, 55, 581-598.
Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod,S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M. &
Brimacombe,
C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for
lineups and photo- spreads, Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.
Whipple, G.M. (1911). The psychology of testimony.
Psychological Bulletin,
8, 307-309.
Wigmore, J. H. (1909). Professor Munsterberg and the psychology of evidence.
Illinois Law Review, 3, 399-345.
Woodhead, M. M., Baddeley, A. D., & Simmonds, D. C. V. (1979). On training
people to recognize faces. Ergonomics, 22, 333-343.
Wright, D. B., Boyd, C. E., &, Tredoux, C. G. (2001). A field study of
own-race bias in South Africa and England. Psychology, Public Policy and
Law, 7, 119-133.
Wright, D. B., Boyd, C. E., & Tredoux, C. G. (2003). Inter-racial contact
and the own-race bias for face recognition in South Africa and England.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 365-373.
Yarmey, A.D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York:
Free Press.
Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness
identification a matter of common sense? In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R.
Clifford (Eds), Evaluating witness evidence. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Return to Top
Home |